I started two posts ago, looking at a question I have been compelled to. The question for me is "what comes next?" If you haven't read that post, take a look here, without it some of this might not make sense. Really, the one question becomes two for me:
1. What comes next? I mean, once we die, what happens then?
2. What about now? What about this world?
I mentioned that I would be journeying toward these questions, to begin with the help of a book by Bishop N.T. Wright (The Bishop of Durham) titled Surprised By Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. And I promised that my next post would begin by analyzing and reflecting on chapter one "All Dressed up And No Place To Go?"
Bishop Wright begins the chapter by explaining the events that gave him impetus for the book. They are specific to him and many of us who are interested in this subject could make our own list. My list has some similarities to his A. September 11th caused me and many others to reflect on both of those questions...in fact for me most of my time responding to 911 was with regard to question number 2. B. Conversation with Christians has been the second reason I am interested, mostly because as I have mentioned before I think most of us just don't know what the "Christian" view of ressurection or the hope to come is. I mean I know there are many "Christian views" (something I know we will look at a few posts off) but most of them are probably wrong...I know most of the ones I hear (although I'm not always quite sure why, hence the need for a study) just don't seem quite right.
Recent Examples (direct from the mouths of non-new Christians :
1. "Well I'm not gonna worry to much about it, because it's all just gonna burn up anyway."
2. "I just can't wait until God takes us out of this place"
3. "I know he's ( a recently passed love one) watching down from Heaven and is happy."
Now don't force me to bring resolution to all of that now, but you know how sometimes you know somethings not right but you're not quite sure why? That's how I am on this subject right now. So Bishop Wright has his reasons for writing the book and I have my reasons for needing to read it. He gives a clue to why the book title is important that doubles as a preliminary look at how he will answer the question when he writes in chapter one, "What hope is there for communities that have lost their way, their way of life, their coherence, their hope?"
He restates the two questions he hopes the book will answer (this time restated a little more helpfully than before) as:
1. What is the ultimate Christian hope?
2. What hope is there for change, rescue, transformation, new possibilities within the world in the present.
And then a preliminary answer to those questions is given that serves as a backbone to other answers that he will spend the rest of the book explaining. His answer to the two questions and really how he would answer my two questions is this: "As long as we see Christian hope in terms of "going to heaven", as a salvation that is essentially away from this world, the two questions are bound to appear as unrelated."
This right away gets to one of my severe problems with the standard thinking that most 3rd millennium American Christians have arrived at. If all we are doing is waiting to get out of here, then why does what were doing right now matter? Stated differently, why would God make me steward over a creation, over a world that he intended to destroy? I don't often think of God as a tricky guy, or someone moving the cups around to try to hide the ball underneath from me, but if we are just waiting to get out of here, isn't that a little bit what he's up to?
Bishop Wright joins me (actually I guess more accurately I'm joining him) in my concern but then gives a second clue to the theology he will develop. "But if the Christian hope is for God's new creation, for "new heavens and new earth" and if hope has already come to life in Jesus of Nazareth, then there is every reason to join the two questions together."
He is going to look at confusion in chapter one and two. The chapter two focus is on confusion in the church, among Christians, and the rest of chapter one is looking at confusion in our world- the wider world beyond our churches. I'll have to save the rest of chapter one for the next post, but why is making it clear that we are confused important? His statement is similar to my quandaries above, stated much more concisely and eloquently: "...most people, including most practicing Christians, are muddled and misguided on this topic, and this muddle produces quite serious mistakes in our thinking, our praying, our liturgies, our practice (see above), and perhaps particularly our mission in the world." Just like I said right?
I know from my days studying philosophy that many of histories greatest philosophers (Plato, Hegel etc.) have put the greatest importance on thinking straight about death, and the life that is beyond death, because it's the key to thinking clearly about everything else. So don't jump off board this thread yet, because "It's a matter of thinking straight about God and his purposes for the cosmos and about what God is doing right now, already, as a part of those purposes."
I just realized that at this rate I won't be to chapter two until 2013...I'll try to move a little faster next time.